A quote by novelist Paul Auster rang so true, I used a phrase from it as the title of my current Tom Hickey novel in progress.
“Only the good doubt their own goodness, which is what makes them good in the first place. The bad know they are good, but the good know nothing.”
The best minds are too small to consider all the complexities around us. The most objective are driven by emotions, needs and passions they can barely begin to understand, let alone control. Surely all our beliefs might be illusions.
We claim to know so that we can feel secure, or to create a useful platform from which to further our particular agenda. Churchgoers aren’t likely to admit to the extent of their doubts. The wealthy commonly believe poverty equals laziness. And so on.
When I passed along the Auster quote to my son Cody, he thought it through then came back with, “But Dad, if that’s true then the good must be ineffectual, because they don’t have the certainty about anything to make a stand.”
Here’s my answwer:
Those of us who can’t be satisfied with a meaningless life are by definition called to make an existential choice, to decide between alternatives and dedicate ourselves to a guiding belief.
As a path toward recognizing the best choice, Kierkegaard argued the value of subjectivity. The highest and deepest truth, he contended, is discovered by an inward journey rather than by observation of external reality. By searching inside ourselves, in solitary, devoted, open-minded exploration; by preferring the instincts of the artist to the over-confident ways of science or philosophy, we can discover realms beyond the external and objective.
Those who have chosen to believe but admit that they are choosing on the basis of subjective experience can draw a distinction between knowledge (in an absolute sense) and belief. Then they can make a stand with dedication and passion, yet retain a lightness of heart and mind, a portion of humility. With these they can avoid the defensiveness or arrogance of the know-it-all.